- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- 2192 vs 2193
Jocca 2192 vs Jocca 2193
What 2192 does better (0) and where 2193 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is 2192 better than 2193?
2192 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 2193 better than 2192?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l vs 8 l+23%
- Power1,600 W vs 1,800 W+12%
- DehydratingNo · 2192: Yes
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,600 W | 1,800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 6.5 l | 8 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | — |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | — | 30 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Air fry, Dehydrate |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | Yes |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LED |
| Timer | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | — | No |
| Non-stick coating | — | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 280 mm | — |
| Height | 315 mm | — |
| Depth | 370 mm | — |
| Colours | Grey | Silver |
