2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 2193 vs NA352

Jocca 2193 vs Philips NA352

What 2193 does better (3) and where NA352 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Jocca 2193
Jocca · 20252193
8.5Score
3 advantages≈ US$130
vs
Philips NA352
Philips · 2025NA352
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$130
Higher score
8.1Power & capacity8.6
7.2Versatility6.1
7.2Controls & convenience8.4

Why is 2193 better than NA352?

  1. DehydratingYes · NA352: No
  2. Non-stick coatingYes · NA352: No
  3. Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%

Why is NA352 better than 2193?

  1. Power1,800 W vs 2,750 W+53%
  2. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · 2193: Yes
  3. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l vs 9 l+12%
  4. BakingNo · 2193: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Jocca 2193Jocca 2193≈ US$1308.5
Philips NA352Philips NA352≈ US$1308.6
Power & capacity
Power1,800 W2,750 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l9 l
Max. temperature200 °C180 °C
Min. temperature30 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, DehydrateCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDLED
TimerYesYes
Max. timer—60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Height—444 mm
Depth—314 mm
ColoursSilver—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare