3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Air Pro 42583 vs 2192

Gastroback Air Pro 42583 vs Jocca 2192

What Air Pro 42583 does better (4) and where 2192 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Gastroback Air Pro 42583
Gastroback · 2024Air Pro 42583
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ US$110
Higher score
vs
Jocca 2192
Jocca · 20242192
5.7Score
0 advantages≈ US$120
7.2Power & capacity5.8
8.9Versatility4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Air Pro 425832192
290 × 298343280 × 315370
Air Pro 425832192Difference
Height298 mm315 mm−17 mm
Width290 mm280 mm+10 mm
Depth343 mm370 mm−27 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Air Pro 42583 better than 2192?

  1. Power1,800 W vs 1,600 W+12%
  2. BakingYes · 2192: No
  3. Grill functionYes · 2192: No
  4. DehydratingYes · 2192: No

Why is 2192 better than Air Pro 42583?

2192 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Jocca 2192Jocca 2192≈ US$1205.7
Power & capacity
Power1,800 W1,600 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l6.5 l
Automatic programmes—8
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNo—
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYes—
Non-stick coatingNo—
HousingStainless steelPlastic
Width290 mm280 mm
Height298 mm315 mm
Depth343 mm370 mm
ColoursBlack, SilverGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare