2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Air Pro 42582 vs NA221

Gastroback Air Pro 42582 vs Philips NA221

What Air Pro 42582 does better (1) and where NA221 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Gastroback Air Pro 42582
Gastroback · 2024Air Pro 42582
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ US$80
vs
Philips NA221
Philips · 2024NA221
5.5Score
4 advantages≈ US$75
Higher score
2.2Power & capacity4.0
8.9Versatility7.7
3.0Controls & convenience4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Air Pro 42582NA221
395 × 374357368 × 293
Air Pro 42582NA221Difference
Height374 mm293 mm+81 mm
Width395 mm368 mm+27 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Air Pro 42582 better than NA221?

  1. DehydratingYes · NA221: No

Why is NA221 better than Air Pro 42582?

  1. Power1,300 W vs 1,500 W+15%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.7 l vs 4.2 l+14%
  3. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LCD
  4. Max. temperature180 °C vs 200 °C+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA221Philips NA221≈ US$755.5
Power & capacity
Power1,300 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.7 l4.2 l
Max. temperature180 °C200 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)LCD
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width395 mm368 mm
Height374 mm293 mm
Depth357 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare