3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Air Pro 42582 vs Easy Fry Grill Vision

Gastroback Air Pro 42582 vs Moulinex Easy Fry Grill Vision

What Air Pro 42582 does better (1) and where Easy Fry Grill Vision wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Gastroback Air Pro 42582
Gastroback · 2024Air Pro 42582
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ US$80
vs
Moulinex Easy Fry Grill Vision
Moulinex · 2024Easy Fry Grill Vision
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ US$95
Higher score
2.2Power & capacity3.3
3.0Controls & convenience5.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Air Pro 42582Easy Fry Grill Vision
395 × 374357361 × 324270
Air Pro 42582Easy Fry Grill VisionDifference
Height374 mm324 mm+50 mm
Width395 mm361 mm+34 mm
Depth357 mm270 mm+87 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Air Pro 42582 better than Easy Fry Grill Vision?

  1. TimerYes · Easy Fry Grill Vision: No

Why is Easy Fry Grill Vision better than Air Pro 42582?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.7 l vs 4.5 l+22%
  2. DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
  3. Max. temperature180 °C vs 190 °C+6%
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power1,300 W—
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.7 l4.5 l
Max. temperature180 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatAir fry
SteamingNo—
BakingYes—
Grill functionYes—
DehydratingYes—
Keep warmNo—
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)Touchscreen
TimerYesNo
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width395 mm361 mm
Height374 mm324 mm
Depth357 mm270 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare