- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- FGR65 vs AF200
Fagor FGR65 vs TurboTronic AF200
What FGR65 does better (1) and where AF200 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
FGR65AF200
| FGR65 | AF200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 340 mm | 320 mm | +20 mm |
| Width | 330 mm | 383 mm | −53 mm |
| Depth | 340 mm | 316 mm | +24 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is FGR65 better than AF200?
- Non-stick coatingYes · AF200: No
Why is AF200 better than FGR65?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l vs 7.2 l+11%
- Power1,600 W vs 1,750 W+9%
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,600 W | 1,750 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 6.5 l | 7.2 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | 8 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 200 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Cook, Air fry |
| Steaming | — | No |
| Baking | — | No |
| Grill function | — | No |
| Dehydrating | — | No |
| Keep warm | — | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LED |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | 60 min | 60 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Metal |
| Cord storage | — | Yes |
| Width | 330 mm | 383 mm |
| Height | 340 mm | 320 mm |
| Depth | 340 mm | 316 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
