2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Turbo Tower Pro Smart vs PHAO

Cosori Turbo Tower Pro Smart vs Philco PHAO

What Turbo Tower Pro Smart does better (7) and where PHAO wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cosori Turbo Tower Pro Smart
Cosori · 2025Turbo Tower Pro Smart
9.5Score
7 advantages≈ US$270
Higher score
vs
Philco PHAO
Philco · 2025PHAO
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$290
8.3Power & capacity9.8
9.4Versatility4.1
9.4Controls & convenience4.3

Why is Turbo Tower Pro Smart better than PHAO?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · PHAO: No
  2. Power2,630 W vs 2,250 W+17%
  3. BakingYes · PHAO: No
  4. Grill functionYes · PHAO: No
  5. DehydratingYes · PHAO: No
  6. Non-stick coatingYes · PHAO: No
  7. Max. temperature230 °C vs 220 °C+5%

Why is PHAO better than Turbo Tower Pro Smart?

  1. Automatic programmes3 vs 165.3×
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)10.8 l vs 15 l+39%
Specifications

Side by side

Philco PHAOPhilco PHAO≈ US$2908.6
Power & capacity
Power2,630 W2,250 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)10.8 l15 l
Automatic programmes316
Max. temperature230 °C220 °C
Min. temperature30 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate, ReheatCook, Air fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Interior light—Yes
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDLCD
Timer—Yes
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Width300 mm—
Height405 mm—
Depth413 mm—
ColoursBlackWhite, Silver
SeriesCosori Turbo Tower—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare