3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Mambo 11090 vs KM 1338

Cecotec Mambo 11090 vs ProfiCook KM 1338

What Mambo 11090 does better (3) and where KM 1338 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Mambo 11090
Cecotec · 2023Mambo 11090
9.5Score
3 advantages≈ US$250
Higher score
vs
ProfiCook KM 1338
ProfiCook · 2026KM 1338
9.3Score
4 advantages≈ US$250
9.4Power & capacity9.8
6.0Versatility3.1
9.2Controls & convenience8.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mambo 11090KM 1338
290 × 325390455 × 406310
Mambo 11090KM 1338Difference
Height325 mm406 mm−81 mm
Width290 mm455 mm−165 mm
Depth390 mm310 mm+80 mm
Weight6.4 kg10.9 kg−4.5 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mambo 11090 better than KM 1338?

  1. Number of accessories5 vs 15×
  2. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · KM 1338: No
  3. Heating / cooking functionYes · KM 1338: No

Why is KM 1338 better than Mambo 11090?

  1. Power1,600 W vs 2,000 W+25%
  2. Pulse functionNo · Mambo 11090: Yes
  3. TimerNo · Mambo 11090: Yes
  4. Speed settings10 vs 12+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Cecotec Mambo 11090Cecotec Mambo 11090≈ US$2509.5
ProfiCook KM 1338ProfiCook KM 1338≈ US$2509.3
Power & capacity
Power1,600 W2,000 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)—11 l
Speed settings1012
Max. dough per batch—7.5 kg
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNoNo
Attachment hub (power outlet)NoNo
Pulse functionNoYes
Soft startNoNo
Heating / cooking functionYesNo
Blender jug3.3 l—
Bowl material—Aluminium
Attachments includedDough hook, Slicing discs, Spatula, Steamer basketSplash guard
Number of accessories51
Cooking modes
FunctionsSteamKnead
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerNoYes
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingYes—
Housing—Aluminium
Weight6.4 kg10.9 kg
Width290 mm455 mm
Height325 mm406 mm
Depth390 mm310 mm
ColoursGreySilver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare