- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Mambo 11090 vs Renata Rossa
Cecotec Mambo 11090 vs Klarstein Renata Rossa
What Mambo 11090 does better (4) and where Renata Rossa wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Power & capacity9.2
5.8Versatility6.7
9.2Controls & convenience6.8
Why is Mambo 11090 better than Renata Rossa?
- Dishwasher-safe partsYes · Renata Rossa: No
- Blender jug3.3 l vs 1.5 l2.2×
- Speed settings10 vs 8+25%
- DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD
Why is Renata Rossa better than Mambo 11090?
- Power1,600 W vs 2,000 W+25%
- Number of accessories5 vs 7+40%
- TimerNo · Mambo 11090: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,600 W | 2,000 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | — | 10 l |
| Speed settings | 10 | 8 |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | No | No |
| Attachment hub (power outlet) | No | No |
| Pulse function | No | No |
| Soft start | No | No |
| Heating / cooking function | Yes | Yes |
| Blender jug | 3.3 l | 1.5 l |
| Bowl material | — | Stainless steel |
| Attachments included | Dough hook, Slicing discs, Spatula, Steamer basket | Whisk, Dough hook, Flat beater, Splash guard, Mincer |
| Number of accessories | 5 | 7 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Steam | Knead, Mix, Chop, Blend, Cook |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | Touchscreen | LCD |
| Timer | No | Yes |
| App control | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | Yes | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | — |
| Housing | — | Plastic |
| Cord length | — | 1 m |
| Weight | 6.4 kg | — |
| Width | 290 mm | — |
| Height | 325 mm | — |
| Depth | 390 mm | — |
| Colours | Grey | — |
Related comparisons
vs
ProfiCook PC-KM 1254vsCecotec Mambo 11090
9.39.5
vs
ECG FORZA 6600 MetallovsCecotec Mambo 11090
9.69.5
vs
Caso KM1800 Black GvsCecotec Mambo 11090
9.69.5
vs
ProfiCook PC-KM 1254vsKlarstein Renata Rossa
9.39.1
vs
Klarstein Renata RossavsCaso KM1800 Black G
9.19.6
vs
Klarstein Renata RossavsPhilips HR7962
9.18.7