2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Mambo 11090 vs HR7962

Cecotec Mambo 11090 vs Philips HR7962

What Mambo 11090 does better (4) and where HR7962 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Mambo 11090
Cecotec · 2023Mambo 11090
9.5Score
4 advantages≈ US$240
Higher score
vs
Philips HR7962
Philips · 2022HR7962
8.7Score
0 advantages≈ US$230
9.4Power & capacity6.4
5.8Versatility3.7
9.2Controls & convenience9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mambo 11090HR7962
290 × 325390360 × 345
Mambo 11090HR7962Difference
Height325 mm345 mm−20 mm
Width290 mm360 mm−70 mm
Weight6.4 kg6.7 kg−0.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mambo 11090 better than HR7962?

  1. Power1,600 W vs 1,000 W+60%
  2. Number of accessories5 vs 3+67%
  3. Speed settings10 vs 8+25%
  4. Heating / cooking functionYes · HR7962: No

Why is HR7962 better than Mambo 11090?

HR7962 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Cecotec Mambo 11090Cecotec Mambo 11090≈ US$2409.5
Philips HR7962Philips HR7962≈ US$2308.7
Power & capacity
Power1,600 W1,000 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)—5.5 l
Speed settings108
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNo—
Attachment hub (power outlet)NoNo
Pulse functionNo—
Soft startNo—
Heating / cooking functionYesNo
Blender jug3.3 l—
Bowl material—Stainless steel
Attachments includedDough hook, Slicing discs, Spatula, Steamer basketWhisk, Dough hook
Number of accessories53
Cooking modes
FunctionsSteamKnead, Mix
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreen—
TimerNo—
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesYes
Non-stick coatingYes—
Housing—Metal
Weight6.4 kg6.7 kg
Width290 mm360 mm
Height325 mm345 mm
Depth390 mm—
ColoursGreyBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare