- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Mambo 11090 vs K-KM-B-PK-1800
Cecotec Mambo 11090 vs KLAMER K-KM-B-PK-1800
What Mambo 11090 does better (2) and where K-KM-B-PK-1800 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Power & capacity9.1
5.8Versatility3.8
9.2Controls & convenience9.8
Why is Mambo 11090 better than K-KM-B-PK-1800?
- Number of accessories5 vs 4+25%
- Heating / cooking functionYes · K-KM-B-PK-1800: No
Why is K-KM-B-PK-1800 better than Mambo 11090?
- Power1,600 W vs 1,800 W+12%
- TimerNo · Mambo 11090: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,600 W | 1,800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | — | 6 l |
| Speed settings | 10 | 10 |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | No | No |
| Attachment hub (power outlet) | No | No |
| Pulse function | No | No |
| Soft start | No | No |
| Heating / cooking function | Yes | No |
| Blender jug | 3.3 l | — |
| Bowl material | — | Stainless steel |
| Attachments included | Dough hook, Slicing discs, Spatula, Steamer basket | Whisk, Dough hook, Flat beater, Splash guard |
| Number of accessories | 5 | 4 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Steam | Knead |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
| Timer | No | Yes |
| App control | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | Yes | Yes |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | — |
| Housing | — | Stainless steel |
| Weight | 6.4 kg | — |
| Width | 290 mm | — |
| Height | 325 mm | — |
| Depth | 390 mm | — |
| Colours | Grey | Pink |
Related comparisons
vs
ProfiCook PC-KM 1254vsCecotec Mambo 11090
9.39.5
vs
ECG FORZA 6600 MetallovsCecotec Mambo 11090
9.69.5
vs
Klarstein Renata RossavsCecotec Mambo 11090
9.19.5
vs
Caso KM1800 Black GvsCecotec Mambo 11090
9.69.5
vs
Concept RM6010vsKLAMER K-KM-B-PK-1800
9.39.5
vs
KLAMER K-KM-B-PK-1800vsBosch Series 6 Sensing
9.59.7