3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Mambo 11090 vs HKM 8120

Cecotec Mambo 11090 vs Heinrich´s HKM 8120

What Mambo 11090 does better (4) and where HKM 8120 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Mambo 11090
Cecotec · 2023Mambo 11090
9.5Score
4 advantages≈ US$250
Higher score
vs
Heinrich´s HKM 8120
Heinrich´s · 2022HKM 8120
7.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$280
9.4Power & capacity8.6
6.0Versatility6.0
9.2Controls & convenience2.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mambo 11090HKM 8120
290 × 325390200 × 436400
Mambo 11090HKM 8120Difference
Height325 mm436 mm−111 mm
Width290 mm200 mm+90 mm
Depth390 mm400 mm−10 mm
Weight6.4 kg12.8 kg−6.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mambo 11090 better than HKM 8120?

  1. Speed settings10 vs 33.3×
  2. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · HKM 8120: No
  3. Heating / cooking functionYes · HKM 8120: No
  4. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)

Why is HKM 8120 better than Mambo 11090?

  1. Power1,600 W vs 1,800 W+12%
  2. Attachment hub (power outlet)No · Mambo 11090: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Cecotec Mambo 11090Cecotec Mambo 11090≈ US$2509.5
Power & capacity
Power1,600 W1,800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)—11 l
Speed settings103
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNoNo
Attachment hub (power outlet)NoYes
Pulse functionNoNo
Soft startNoNo
Heating / cooking functionYesNo
Blender jug3.3 l—
Bowl material—Stainless steel
Attachments includedDough hook, Slicing discs, Spatula, Steamer basketWhisk, Dough hook, Flat beater, Splash guard
Number of accessories55
Cooking modes
FunctionsSteamKnead, Whisk, Mix
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerNoNo
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingYes—
Weight6.4 kg12.8 kg
Width290 mm200 mm
Height325 mm436 mm
Depth390 mm400 mm
ColoursGrey—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare