2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Mambo 11090 vs HKM 8080

Cecotec Mambo 11090 vs Heinrich´s HKM 8080

What Mambo 11090 does better (2) and where HKM 8080 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Mambo 11090
Cecotec · 2023Mambo 11090
9.5Score
2 advantages≈ US$240
Higher score
vs
Heinrich´s HKM 8080
Heinrich´s · 2025HKM 8080
1 advantage≈ US$170
9.4Power & capacity9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mambo 11090HKM 8080
290 × 325390390 × 350255
Mambo 11090HKM 8080Difference
Height325 mm350 mm−25 mm
Width290 mm390 mm−100 mm
Depth390 mm255 mm+135 mm
Weight6.4 kg6.5 kg−0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mambo 11090 better than HKM 8080?

  1. Number of accessories5 vs 3+67%
  2. Speed settings10 vs 8+25%

Why is HKM 8080 better than Mambo 11090?

  1. Power1,600 W vs 2,500 W+56%
Specifications

Side by side

Cecotec Mambo 11090Cecotec Mambo 11090≈ US$2409.5
Power & capacity
Power1,600 W2,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)—8 l
Speed settings108
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNo—
Attachment hub (power outlet)No—
Pulse functionNo—
Soft startNo—
Heating / cooking functionYes—
Blender jug3.3 l—
Bowl material—Stainless steel
Attachments includedDough hook, Slicing discs, Spatula, Steamer basketWhisk, Dough hook, Flat beater
Number of accessories53
Cooking modes
FunctionsSteam—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreen—
TimerNo—
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYes—
Non-stick coatingYes—
Housing—Stainless steel
Weight6.4 kg6.5 kg
Width290 mm390 mm
Height325 mm350 mm
Depth390 mm255 mm
ColoursGrey—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare