2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Mambo 11090 vs KM128

Cecotec Mambo 11090 vs H.Koenig KM128

What Mambo 11090 does better (4) and where KM128 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Mambo 11090
Cecotec · 2023Mambo 11090
9.5Score
4 advantages≈ US$240
Higher score
vs
H.Koenig KM128
H.Koenig · 2021KM128
7.7Score
0 advantages≈ US$240
9.4Power & capacity4.8
5.8Versatility2.7
9.2Controls & convenience9.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mambo 11090KM128
290 × 325390390 × 340220
Mambo 11090KM128Difference
Height325 mm340 mm−15 mm
Width290 mm390 mm−100 mm
Depth390 mm220 mm+170 mm
Weight6.4 kg8.2 kg−1.8 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mambo 11090 better than KM128?

  1. Power1,600 W vs 800 W2×
  2. Number of accessories5 vs 22.5×
  3. Speed settings10 vs 8+25%
  4. Heating / cooking functionYes · KM128: No

Why is KM128 better than Mambo 11090?

KM128 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Cecotec Mambo 11090Cecotec Mambo 11090≈ US$2409.5
H.Koenig KM128H.Koenig KM128≈ US$2407.7
Power & capacity
Power1,600 W800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)—5 l
Speed settings108
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNo—
Mixer design—Tilt-head
Attachment hub (power outlet)NoNo
Pulse functionNo—
Soft startNo—
Heating / cooking functionYesNo
Blender jug3.3 l—
Bowl material—Stainless steel
Attachments includedDough hook, Slicing discs, Spatula, Steamer basketDough hook
Number of accessories52
Cooking modes
FunctionsSteamKnead, Whisk
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerNo—
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesYes
Non-stick coatingYes—
Weight6.4 kg8.2 kg
Width290 mm390 mm
Height325 mm340 mm
Depth390 mm220 mm
ColoursGreySilver, Green
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare