3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Mambo 11090 vs G20137

Cecotec Mambo 11090 vs G3 Ferrari G20137

What Mambo 11090 does better (4) and where G20137 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Mambo 11090
Cecotec · 2023Mambo 11090
9.5Score
4 advantages≈ US$250
Higher score
vs
G3 Ferrari G20137
G3 Ferrari · 2022G20137
8.7Score
2 advantages≈ US$340
9.4Power & capacity9.6
6.0Versatility2.7
9.2Controls & convenience7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mambo 11090G20137
290 × 325390400 × 350250
Mambo 11090G20137Difference
Height325 mm350 mm−25 mm
Width290 mm400 mm−110 mm
Depth390 mm250 mm+140 mm
Weight6.4 kg8.1 kg−1.7 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mambo 11090 better than G20137?

  1. Number of accessories5 vs 22.5×
  2. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · G20137: No
  3. Heating / cooking functionYes · G20137: No
  4. DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD

Why is G20137 better than Mambo 11090?

  1. Power1,600 W vs 1,800 W+12%
  2. TimerNo · Mambo 11090: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Cecotec Mambo 11090Cecotec Mambo 11090≈ US$2509.5
G3 Ferrari G20137G3 Ferrari G20137≈ US$3408.7
Power & capacity
Power1,600 W1,800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)—8 l
Speed settings1010
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNoNo
Attachment hub (power outlet)NoNo
Pulse functionNoNo
Soft startNoNo
Heating / cooking functionYesNo
Blender jug3.3 l—
Bowl material—Stainless steel
Attachments includedDough hook, Slicing discs, Spatula, Steamer basketWhisk
Number of accessories52
Cooking modes
FunctionsSteamKnead
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLCD
TimerNoYes
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingYes—
Housing—Metal
Weight6.4 kg8.1 kg
Width290 mm400 mm
Height325 mm350 mm
Depth390 mm250 mm
ColoursGrey—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare