3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Mambo 11090 vs G20120

Cecotec Mambo 11090 vs G3 Ferrari G20120

What Mambo 11090 does better (5) and where G20120 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Mambo 11090
Cecotec · 2023Mambo 11090
9.5Score
5 advantages≈ US$250
Higher score
vs
G3 Ferrari G20120
G3 Ferrari · 2021G20120
9.3Score
0 advantages≈ US$180
9.4Power & capacity9.0
6.0Versatility5.8
9.2Controls & convenience8.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mambo 11090G20120
290 × 325390400 × 395270
Mambo 11090G20120Difference
Height325 mm395 mm−70 mm
Width290 mm400 mm−110 mm
Depth390 mm270 mm+120 mm
Weight6.4 kg6.4 kg=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mambo 11090 better than G20120?

  1. Speed settings10 vs 6+67%
  2. Power1,600 W vs 1,500 W+7%
  3. Number of accessories5 vs 4+25%
  4. Heating / cooking functionYes · G20120: No
  5. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)

Why is G20120 better than Mambo 11090?

G20120 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Cecotec Mambo 11090Cecotec Mambo 11090≈ US$2509.5
G3 Ferrari G20120G3 Ferrari G20120≈ US$1809.3
Power & capacity
Power1,600 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)—10 l
Speed settings106
Max. dough per batch—4 kg
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNo—
Attachment hub (power outlet)No—
Pulse functionNo—
Soft startNo—
Heating / cooking functionYesNo
Blender jug3.3 l—
Bowl material—Plastic
Attachments includedDough hook, Slicing discs, Spatula, Steamer basketWhisk, Dough hook, Flat beater
Number of accessories54
Cooking modes
FunctionsSteamKnead, Whisk, Mix
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerNo—
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesYes
Non-stick coatingYes—
Housing—Plastic
Weight6.4 kg6.4 kg
Width290 mm400 mm
Height325 mm395 mm
Depth390 mm270 mm
ColoursGreyBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare