3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Mambo 11090 vs ETA002390070

Cecotec Mambo 11090 vs ETA ETA002390070

What Mambo 11090 does better (4) and where ETA002390070 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Mambo 11090
Cecotec · 2023Mambo 11090
9.5Score
4 advantages≈ US$250
Higher score
vs
ETA ETA002390070
ETA · 2022ETA002390070
6.9Score
2 advantages≈ US$260
9.4Power & capacity3.2
6.0Versatility8.7
9.2Controls & convenience8.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Mambo 11090ETA002390070
290 × 325390190 × 370340
Mambo 11090ETA002390070Difference
Height325 mm370 mm−45 mm
Width290 mm190 mm+100 mm
Depth390 mm340 mm+50 mm
Weight6.4 kg5.5 kg+0.9 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mambo 11090 better than ETA002390070?

  1. Power1,600 W vs 800 W2×
  2. Blender jug3.3 l vs 1.4 l2.4×
  3. Heating / cooking functionYes · ETA002390070: No
  4. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)

Why is ETA002390070 better than Mambo 11090?

  1. Planetary mixing actionNo · Mambo 11090: Yes
  2. Number of accessories5 vs 8+60%
Specifications

Side by side

Cecotec Mambo 11090Cecotec Mambo 11090≈ US$2509.5
ETA ETA002390070ETA ETA002390070≈ US$2606.9
Power & capacity
Power1,600 W800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)—4.5 l
Speed settings10—
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNoYes
Attachment hub (power outlet)No—
Pulse functionNoNo
Soft startNoNo
Heating / cooking functionYesNo
Blender jug3.3 l1.4 l
Bowl material—Stainless steel
Attachments includedDough hook, Slicing discs, Spatula, Steamer basketWhisk, Dough hook, Mincer
Number of accessories58
Cooking modes
FunctionsSteamSlice
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerNoNo
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesYes
Non-stick coatingYes—
Housing—Plastic
Cord length—1.2 m
Weight6.4 kg5.5 kg
Width290 mm190 mm
Height325 mm370 mm
Depth390 mm340 mm
ColoursGreyGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare