- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Cecofry Pixel 2500 vs HF11138
Cecotec Cecofry Pixel 2500 vs Grafner HF11138
What Cecofry Pixel 2500 does better (0) and where HF11138 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Power & capacity2.9
4.1Versatility4.1
3.0Controls & convenience6.5
Why is Cecofry Pixel 2500 better than HF11138?
Cecofry Pixel 2500 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is HF11138 better than Cecofry Pixel 2500?
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
- Non-stick coatingNo · Cecofry Pixel 2500: Yes
- Max. temperature180 °C vs 200 °C+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,200 W | 1,200 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | — | 3.6 l |
| Max. temperature | 180 °C | 200 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LED |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | 30 min | 60 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Metal |
| Colours | Black | Black |
