- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- FR 6050 vs Cecofry Pixel 2500
Bomann FR 6050 vs Cecotec Cecofry Pixel 2500
What FR 6050 does better (1) and where Cecofry Pixel 2500 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Power & capacity2.0
4.1Versatility4.1
4.8Controls & convenience3.0
Why is FR 6050 better than Cecofry Pixel 2500?
- Non-stick coatingYes · Cecofry Pixel 2500: No
Why is Cecofry Pixel 2500 better than FR 6050?
- Power1,000 W vs 1,200 W+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,000 W | 1,200 W |
| Max. temperature | 180 °C | 180 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | — | 30 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 265 mm | — |
| Height | 320 mm | — |
| Depth | 340 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
