- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Cecofry Pixel 2500 vs 11974
Cecotec Cecofry Pixel 2500 vs GOURMETmaxx 11974
What Cecofry Pixel 2500 does better (0) and where 11974 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Power & capacity3.9
4.1Versatility8.5
3.0Controls & convenience5.7
Why is Cecofry Pixel 2500 better than 11974?
Cecofry Pixel 2500 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 11974 better than Cecofry Pixel 2500?
- Power1,200 W vs 1,450 W+21%
- BakingNo · Cecofry Pixel 2500: Yes
- Grill functionNo · Cecofry Pixel 2500: Yes
- Keep warmNo · Cecofry Pixel 2500: Yes
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs Touchscreen
- Max. temperature180 °C vs 200 °C+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,200 W | 1,450 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | — | 4.5 l |
| Max. temperature | 180 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | — | 80 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warm |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | Yes |
| Grill function | No | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | Yes |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | Touchscreen |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | 30 min | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Metal |
| Width | — | 340 mm |
| Height | — | 270 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
