2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500 vs NA220

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500 vs Philips NA220

What Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500 does better (2) and where NA220 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500
6.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$80
vs
Philips NA220
Philips · 2024NA220
7.0Score
4 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
5.6Power & capacity4.0
2.5Versatility8.9
7.8Controls & convenience8.4

Why is Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500 better than NA220?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.5 l vs 4.2 l+31%
  2. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)

Why is NA220 better than Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500: Yes
  2. BakingNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500: Yes
  3. Grill functionNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500: Yes
  4. Keep warmNo · Cecofry Fantastik Window 5500: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NA220Philips NA220≈ US$857.0
Power & capacity
Power1,500 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.5 l4.2 l
Automatic programmes9—
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature80 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fryCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width—273 mm
Height—293 mm
Depth—368 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare