- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox vs Thunder
Cecotec Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox vs Ufesa Thunder
What Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox does better (2) and where Thunder wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Power & capacity7.3
5.7Versatility4.1
8.7Controls & convenience8.7
Why is Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox better than Thunder?
- Power2,800 W vs 1,700 W+65%
- Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%
Why is Thunder better than Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox?
- Automatic programmes8 vs 11+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,800 W | 1,700 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 9 l | 9 l |
| Automatic programmes | 8 | 11 |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 180 °C |
| Min. temperature | 30 °C | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | Yes |
| Housing | Metal | Plastic |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
Cecotec Cecofry Advance 9000 InoxvsRommelsbacher FRH 1700
9.08.9
vs
Xiaomi MAF15vsCecotec Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox
8.79.0
vs
Masterpro BGMP-9309vsCecotec Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox
8.99.0
vs
Cecotec Cecofry Advance 9000 InoxvsGOURMETmaxx XXL 13208
9.08.6
vs
Caso 3185 AirFry 6.0vsUfesa Thunder
7.87.8