- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- 100500 vs AF200
Cecotec 100500 vs TurboTronic AF200
What 100500 does better (1) and where AF200 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is 100500 better than AF200?
- Grill functionYes · AF200: No
Why is AF200 better than 100500?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6.5 l vs 7.2 l+11%
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
- Max. temperature190 °C vs 200 °C+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | — | 1,750 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 6.5 l | 7.2 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 8 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 200 °C |
| Food capacity | 6.5 kg | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry, Grill | Cook, Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | Yes | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LED |
| Timer | — | Yes |
| Max. timer | — | 60 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | — | No |
| Non-stick coating | — | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Metal |
| Cord storage | — | Yes |
| Width | — | 383 mm |
| Height | — | 320 mm |
| Depth | — | 316 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
