2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 660 Duplex vs NA320

Caso AF 660 Duplex vs Philips NA320

What AF 660 Duplex does better (4) and where NA320 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Caso AF 660 Duplex
Caso · 2024AF 660 Duplex
7.8Score
4 advantages≈ US$100
Higher score
vs
Philips NA320
Philips · 2024NA320
5.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$95
6.0Power & capacity3.0
9.3Versatility8.9
5.6Controls & convenience3.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

AF 660 DuplexNA320
300 × 370385286 × 294
AF 660 DuplexNA320Difference
Height370 mm294 mm+76 mm
Width300 mm286 mm+14 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AF 660 Duplex better than NA320?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l vs 4.2 l+43%
  2. Keep warmYes · NA320: No
  3. DisplayTouchscreen vs None (dials / switches)
  4. Max. temperature200 °C vs 190 °C+5%

Why is NA320 better than AF 660 Duplex?

  1. DehydratingNo · AF 660 Duplex: Yes
  2. Viewing windowNo · AF 660 Duplex: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Caso AF 660 DuplexCaso AF 660 Duplex≈ US$1007.8
Philips NA320Philips NA320≈ US$955.3
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W—
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l4.2 l
Max. temperature200 °C190 °C
Min. temperature50 °C—
Food capacity1.2 kg—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warmCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, Dehydrate, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoYes
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenNone (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingStainless steelPlastic
Width300 mm286 mm
Height370 mm294 mm
Depth385 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare