3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 255 vs Vortx T17186

Caso AF 255 vs Tower Vortx T17186

What AF 255 does better (1) and where Vortx T17186 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Caso AF 255
Caso · 2020AF 255
5.9Score
1 advantage≈ US$50
vs
Tower Vortx T17186
7.6Score
3 advantages≈ US$50
Higher score
3.0Power & capacity6.0
9.1Versatility7.0
7.0Controls & convenience8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

AF 255Vortx T17186
286 × 305348342 × 306260
AF 255Vortx T17186Difference
Height305 mm306 mm−1 mm
Width286 mm342 mm−56 mm
Depth348 mm260 mm+88 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AF 255 better than Vortx T17186?

  1. BakingYes · Vortx T17186: No

Why is Vortx T17186 better than AF 255?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l vs 5 l+67%
  2. Power1,400 W vs 1,500 W+7%
  3. DehydratingNo · AF 255: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Caso AF 255Caso AF 255≈ US$505.9
Tower Vortx T17186Tower Vortx T17186≈ US$507.6
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l5 l
Automatic programmes—11
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature60 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm—
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoYes
Keep warmYes—
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Rotating basket / rotisserie—No
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDLCD
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingStainless steel—
Width286 mm342 mm
Height305 mm306 mm
Depth348 mm260 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare