3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 255 vs KAF 121821

Caso AF 255 vs Koenic KAF 121821

What AF 255 does better (6) and where KAF 121821 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Caso AF 255
Caso · 2020AF 255
5.9Score
6 advantages≈ US$50
Higher score
vs
Koenic KAF 121821
Koenic · 2020KAF 121821
5.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$45
3.0Power & capacity5.0
9.1Versatility4.1
7.0Controls & convenience4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

AF 255KAF 121821
286 × 305348300 × 375325
AF 255KAF 121821Difference
Height305 mm375 mm−70 mm
Width286 mm300 mm−14 mm
Depth348 mm325 mm+23 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AF 255 better than KAF 121821?

  1. BakingYes · KAF 121821: No
  2. Grill functionYes · KAF 121821: No
  3. Keep warmYes · KAF 121821: No
  4. DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)
  5. Non-stick coatingYes · KAF 121821: No
  6. Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%

Why is KAF 121821 better than AF 255?

  1. Power1,400 W vs 1,800 W+29%
  2. Viewing windowNo · AF 255: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Caso AF 255Caso AF 255≈ US$505.9
Koenic KAF 121821Koenic KAF 121821≈ US$455.3
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l—
Max. temperature200 °C180 °C
Min. temperature60 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warmAir fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoYes
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDNone (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingStainless steelPlastic
Width286 mm300 mm
Height305 mm375 mm
Depth348 mm325 mm
ColoursBlackBlack, Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare