- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- AF 255 vs KAF 121821
Caso AF 255 vs Koenic KAF 121821
What AF 255 does better (6) and where KAF 121821 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Power & capacity5.1
9.1Versatility4.1
7.0Controls & convenience3.9
Why is AF 255 better than KAF 121821?
- BakingYes · KAF 121821: No
- Grill functionYes · KAF 121821: No
- Keep warmYes · KAF 121821: No
- DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)
- Non-stick coatingYes · KAF 121821: No
- Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%
Why is KAF 121821 better than AF 255?
- Power1,400 W vs 1,800 W+29%
- Viewing windowNo · AF 255: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,400 W | 1,800 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 3 l | — |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 180 °C |
| Min. temperature | 60 °C | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm | Air fry, Reheat |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | No |
| Grill function | Yes | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | Yes | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | — |
| Max. timer | 60 min | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | No |
| Housing | Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Width | 286 mm | — |
| Height | 305 mm | — |
| Depth | 348 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black, Silver |
