2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 255 vs Vortx T17174

Caso AF 255 vs Tower Vortx T17174

What AF 255 does better (2) and where Vortx T17174 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Caso AF 255
Caso · 2020AF 255
5.9Score
2 advantages≈ US$45
vs
Tower Vortx T17174
6.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$65
Higher score
3.0Power & capacity3.1
9.1Versatility6.9
7.0Controls & convenience9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

AF 255Vortx T17174
286 × 305348250 × 278366
AF 255Vortx T17174Difference
Height305 mm278 mm+27 mm
Width286 mm250 mm+36 mm
Depth348 mm366 mm−18 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AF 255 better than Vortx T17174?

  1. Power1,400 W vs 1,300 W+8%
  2. BakingYes · Vortx T17174: No

Why is Vortx T17174 better than AF 255?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l vs 4 l+33%
  2. Viewing windowNo · AF 255: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Caso AF 255Caso AF 255≈ US$455.9
Tower Vortx T17174Tower Vortx T17174≈ US$656.2
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,300 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l4 l
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature60 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm—
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoYes
Rotating basket / rotisserie—No
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDLCD
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingYes—
HousingStainless steel—
Width286 mm250 mm
Height305 mm278 mm
Depth348 mm366 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare