2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 255 vs Vortx T17147

Caso AF 255 vs Tower Vortx T17147

What AF 255 does better (1) and where Vortx T17147 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Caso AF 255
Caso · 2020AF 255
5.9Score
1 advantage≈ US$45
vs
Tower Vortx T17147
6.5Score
2 advantages≈ US$50
Higher score
3.0Power & capacity5.2
9.1Versatility6.9
7.0Controls & convenience6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

AF 255Vortx T17147
286 × 305348258 × 344287
AF 255Vortx T17147Difference
Height305 mm344 mm−39 mm
Width286 mm258 mm+28 mm
Depth348 mm287 mm+61 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AF 255 better than Vortx T17147?

  1. Grill functionYes · Vortx T17147: No

Why is Vortx T17147 better than AF 255?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l vs 4.2 l+40%
  2. DisplayLCD vs Touchscreen
Specifications

Side by side

Caso AF 255Caso AF 255≈ US$455.9
Tower Vortx T17147Tower Vortx T17147≈ US$506.5
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l4.2 l
Automatic programmes—11
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature60 °C—
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm—
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Rotating basket / rotisserie—No
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNo—
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingStainless steel—
Cord length—0.8 m
Width286 mm258 mm
Height305 mm344 mm
Depth348 mm287 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare