- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- AF 255 vs Easy Fry Compact EY1018
Caso AF 255 vs Tefal Easy Fry Compact EY1018
What AF 255 does better (5) and where Easy Fry Compact EY1018 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Power & capacity2.6
9.1Versatility7.0
7.0Controls & convenience8.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
AF 255Easy Fry Compact EY1018
| AF 255 | Easy Fry Compact EY1018 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 305 mm | 365 mm | −60 mm |
| Width | 286 mm | 250 mm | +36 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is AF 255 better than Easy Fry Compact EY1018?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l vs 1.6 l+88%
- Power1,400 W vs 1,200 W+17%
- Keep warmYes · Easy Fry Compact EY1018: No
- DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)
- Min. temperature60 °C vs 80 °C+33%
Why is Easy Fry Compact EY1018 better than AF 255?
- Dishwasher-safe partsNo · AF 255: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,400 W | 1,200 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 3 l | 1.6 l |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | 60 °C | 80 °C |
| Food capacity | — | 0.4 kg |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm | Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | Yes |
| Grill function | Yes | Yes |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | Yes | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | 60 min | 30 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | Yes |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | Yes |
| Housing | Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Width | 286 mm | 250 mm |
| Height | 305 mm | 365 mm |
| Depth | 348 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Series | — | Tefal Easy Fry |
