3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 13 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 255 vs AF 3500

Caso AF 255 vs ECG AF 3500

What AF 255 does better (3) and where AF 3500 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Caso AF 255
Caso · 2020AF 255
5.9Score
3 advantages≈ US$50
vs
ECG AF 3500
ECG · 2022AF 3500
6.1Score
1 advantage≈ US$50
Higher score
3.0Power & capacity5.0
9.1Versatility6.9
7.0Controls & convenience5.1

Why is AF 255 better than AF 3500?

  1. Keep warmYes · AF 3500: No
  2. DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)
  3. Min. temperature60 °C vs 80 °C+33%

Why is AF 3500 better than AF 255?

  1. Power1,400 W vs 1,500 W+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Caso AF 255Caso AF 255≈ US$505.9
ECG AF 3500ECG AF 3500≈ US$506.1
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l—
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature60 °C80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warmAir fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesYes
Grill functionYesYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNo—
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDNone (dials / switches)
TimerYes—
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingStainless steelPlastic
Width286 mm—
Height305 mm—
Depth348 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare