2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. AF 255 vs Cecofry Bombastik 6000 Full

Caso AF 255 vs Cecotec Cecofry Bombastik 6000 Full

What AF 255 does better (6) and where Cecofry Bombastik 6000 Full wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Caso AF 255
Caso · 2020AF 255
5.9Score
6 advantages≈ US$45
vs
Cecotec Cecofry Bombastik 6000 Full
6.0Score
2 advantages≈ US$45
Higher score
3.0Power & capacity7.6
9.1Versatility2.5
7.0Controls & convenience2.7

Why is AF 255 better than Cecofry Bombastik 6000 Full?

  1. BakingYes · Cecofry Bombastik 6000 Full: No
  2. Grill functionYes · Cecofry Bombastik 6000 Full: No
  3. Keep warmYes · Cecofry Bombastik 6000 Full: No
  4. DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)
  5. Non-stick coatingYes · Cecofry Bombastik 6000 Full: No
  6. Min. temperature60 °C vs 80 °C+33%

Why is Cecofry Bombastik 6000 Full better than AF 255?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l vs 6 l2×
  2. Power1,400 W vs 1,700 W+21%
Specifications

Side by side

Caso AF 255Caso AF 255≈ US$455.9
Power & capacity
Power1,400 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3 l6 l
Automatic programmes—12
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature60 °C80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warmAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDNone (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesNo
HousingStainless steelPlastic
Width286 mm—
Height305 mm—
Depth348 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare