- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- 3185 AirFry 6.0 vs Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000
Caso 3185 AirFry 6.0 vs Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000
What 3185 AirFry 6.0 does better (5) and where Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Power & capacity4.5
7.7Versatility2.5
7.8Controls & convenience5.6
Why is 3185 AirFry 6.0 better than Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l vs 4 l+50%
- Power1,700 W vs 1,400 W+21%
- BakingYes · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: No
- DehydratingYes · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: No
- Viewing windowYes · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: No
Why is Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 better than 3185 AirFry 6.0?
Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,700 W | 1,400 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 6 l | 4 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 9 |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | — | 80 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Dehydrate | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | Yes | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | Yes | No |
| Interior light | Yes | — |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | 60 min | 60 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Width | 280 mm | — |
| Height | 400 mm | — |
| Depth | 280 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
Related comparisons
vs
Caso 3185 AirFry 6.0vsProfiCook PC-FR 1287
7.88.0
vs
Caso 3185 AirFry 6.0vsCecotec Cecofry&Grill Duoheat 6500
7.87.5
vs
Caso 3185 AirFry 6.0vsKoenic KAF 71523 B
7.88.0
vs
Caso 3185 AirFry 6.0vsPhilips Airfryer XL HD9257
7.87.5
vs
Caso 3185 AirFry 6.0vsUfesa Thunder
7.87.8
vs
Fakir Uno ChefryvsCecotec Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000
5.15.1

