2,326 models · 427 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 3185 AirFry 6.0 vs Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000

Caso 3185 AirFry 6.0 vs Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000

What 3185 AirFry 6.0 does better (5) and where Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Caso 3185 AirFry 6.0
Caso · 20243185 AirFry 6.0
7.8Score
5 advantages≈ US$70
Higher score
vs
Cecotec Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000
5.1Score
0 advantages≈ US$65
6.0Power & capacity4.5
7.7Versatility2.5
7.8Controls & convenience5.6

Why is 3185 AirFry 6.0 better than Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l vs 4 l+50%
  2. Power1,700 W vs 1,400 W+21%
  3. BakingYes · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: No
  4. DehydratingYes · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: No
  5. Viewing windowYes · Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000: No

Why is Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 better than 3185 AirFry 6.0?

Cecofry Fantastik Inox 4000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power1,700 W1,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l4 l
Automatic programmes—9
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature—80 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, DehydrateAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesNo
Interior lightYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width280 mm—
Height400 mm—
Depth280 mm—
ColoursBlackGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare