2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. 3185 AirFry 6.0 vs Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox

Caso 3185 AirFry 6.0 vs Cecotec Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox

What 3185 AirFry 6.0 does better (2) and where Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Caso 3185 AirFry 6.0
Caso · 20243185 AirFry 6.0
7.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$70
vs
Cecotec Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox
9.0Score
3 advantages≈ US$70
Higher score
6.0Power & capacity9.0
7.7Versatility5.7
7.8Controls & convenience8.7

Why is 3185 AirFry 6.0 better than Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox?

  1. BakingYes · Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox: No
  2. DehydratingYes · Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox: No

Why is Cecofry Advance 9000 Inox better than 3185 AirFry 6.0?

  1. Power1,700 W vs 2,800 W+65%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l vs 9 l+50%
  3. Non-stick coatingNo · 3185 AirFry 6.0: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power1,700 W2,800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l9 l
Automatic programmes—8
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature—30 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, DehydrateAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingYesNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYes—
Interior lightYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticMetal
Width280 mm—
Height400 mm—
Depth280 mm—
ColoursBlackGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare