- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- AMPF9 vs PHAO
Arthur Martin AMPF9 vs Philco PHAO
What AMPF9 does better (0) and where PHAO wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is AMPF9 better than PHAO?
AMPF9 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is PHAO better than AMPF9?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)9 l vs 15 l+67%
- Power2,000 W vs 2,250 W+12%
- DisplayLED vs LCD
- Max. temperature200 °C vs 220 °C+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 2,000 W | 2,250 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 9 l | 15 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 16 |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 220 °C |
| Min. temperature | 80 °C | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry, Roast, Reheat | Cook, Air fry, Reheat |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Interior light | — | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LED | LCD |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | 60 min | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Metal | Stainless steel |
| Colours | Black | White, Silver |
