2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Cube 30IBT vs AF 255

Aigostar Cube 30IBT vs Caso AF 255

What Cube 30IBT does better (4) and where AF 255 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Aigostar Cube 30IBT
Aigostar · 2021Cube 30IBT
7.9Score
4 advantages≈ US$50
Higher score
vs
Caso AF 255
Caso · 2020AF 255
5.9Score
5 advantages≈ US$45
7.2Power & capacity3.0
2.5Versatility9.1
9.1Controls & convenience7.0

Why is Cube 30IBT better than AF 255?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l vs 3 l2.3×
  2. Dishwasher-safe partsYes · AF 255: No
  3. Power1,900 W vs 1,400 W+36%
  4. DisplayTouchscreen vs LCD

Why is AF 255 better than Cube 30IBT?

  1. BakingNo · Cube 30IBT: Yes
  2. Grill functionNo · Cube 30IBT: Yes
  3. Keep warmNo · Cube 30IBT: Yes
  4. Non-stick coatingNo · Cube 30IBT: Yes
  5. Min. temperature80 °C vs 60 °C+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Caso AF 255Caso AF 255≈ US$455.9
Power & capacity
Power1,900 W1,400 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l3 l
Automatic programmes8—
Max. temperature200 °C200 °C
Min. temperature80 °C60 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Roast, ReheatCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Reheat, Keep warm
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionNoYes
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLCD
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min60 min
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesNo
Non-stick coatingNoYes
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Width—286 mm
Height—305 mm
Depth—348 mm
ColoursBlack, SilverBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare