- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- CUBE 2.0 vs SFT 1900
aeco CUBE 2.0 vs Silvercrest SFT 1900
What CUBE 2.0 does better (2) and where SFT 1900 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is CUBE 2.0 better than SFT 1900?
- BakingYes · SFT 1900: No
- Grill functionYes · SFT 1900: No
Why is SFT 1900 better than CUBE 2.0?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2 l vs 2.1 l+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | — | 1,900 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 2 l | 2.1 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 3 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 190 °C |
| Min. temperature | — | 130 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | No |
| Grill function | Yes | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | 60 min | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Width | 218 mm | — |
| Height | — | 235 mm |
| Depth | 290 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | White, Silver |
