2,326 models · 427 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. Cube vs SFT 1900

aeco Cube vs Silvercrest SFT 1900

What Cube does better (2) and where SFT 1900 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

aeco Cube
aeco · 2025Cube
4.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$35
Higher score
vs
Silvercrest SFT 1900
Silvercrest · 2025SFT 1900
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$30
2.2Power & capacity3.4
7.7Versatility2.0
6.0Controls & convenience4.8

Why is Cube better than SFT 1900?

  1. BakingYes · SFT 1900: No
  2. Grill functionYes · SFT 1900: No

Why is SFT 1900 better than Cube?

  1. Power1,150 W vs 1,900 W+65%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2 l vs 2.1 l+5%
Specifications

Side by side

aeco Cubeaeco Cube≈ US$354.3
Power & capacity
Power1,150 W1,900 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)2 l2.1 l
Automatic programmes—3
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Min. temperature—130 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, GrillAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing window—No
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)None (dials / switches)
TimerYesYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingPlasticStainless steel
Height—235 mm
ColoursBlackWhite, Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare