- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- AF250 vs E1645
TurboTronic AF250 vs Uten E1645
What AF250 does better (3) and where E1645 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is AF250 better than E1645?
- Dishwasher-safe partsYes · E1645: No
- DehydratingYes · E1645: No
- Non-stick coatingYes · E1645: No
Why is E1645 better than AF250?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)6 l vs 10 l+67%
- Power1,500 W vs 1,700 W+13%
- Keep warmNo · AF250: Yes
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LCD
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,500 W | 1,700 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 6 l | 10 l |
| Automatic programmes | 12 | 12 |
| Max. temperature | 190 °C | 190 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Cook, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Dehydrate | Sauté, Air fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warm |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | Yes | Yes |
| Grill function | Yes | Yes |
| Dehydrating | Yes | No |
| Keep warm | No | Yes |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | — | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LCD |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | Yes | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Stainless steel |
| Colours | Grey | Black, Silver |
