- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- AF12 vs AF200
TurboTronic AF12 vs TurboTronic AF200
What AF12 does better (0) and where AF200 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
AF12AF200
| AF12 | AF200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 337 mm | 320 mm | +17 mm |
| Width | 273 mm | 383 mm | −110 mm |
| Depth | 322 mm | 316 mm | +6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is AF12 better than AF200?
AF12 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is AF200 better than AF12?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 7.2 l+44%
- Power1,600 W vs 1,750 W+9%
- DisplayNone (dials / switches) vs LED
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,600 W | 1,750 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5 l | 7.2 l |
| Automatic programmes | — | 8 |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | 100 °C | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry | Cook, Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | No | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | LED |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Max. timer | 60 min | 60 min |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | No | No |
| Housing | Plastic | Metal |
| Cord storage | — | Yes |
| Width | 273 mm | 383 mm |
| Height | 337 mm | 320 mm |
| Depth | 322 mm | 316 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
