- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- FR-6999 vs Phantom
Tristar FR-6999 vs Ufesa Phantom
What FR-6999 does better (3) and where Phantom wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is FR-6999 better than Phantom?
- Power1,700 W vs 1,500 W+13%
- Automatic programmes10 vs 8+25%
- Keep warmYes · Phantom: No
Why is Phantom better than FR-6999?
Phantom has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 1,700 W | 1,500 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | — | 5 l |
| Automatic programmes | 10 | 8 |
| Max. temperature | 200 °C | 200 °C |
| Min. temperature | 80 °C | 80 °C |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Air fry, Keep warm | Air fry |
| Steaming | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | Yes | No |
| Baskets / cooking zones | 1 | 1 |
| Viewing window | No | No |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | Touchscreen | Touchscreen |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | Yes |
| Housing | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | — |
