2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. T17205 vs AF11M

Tower T17205 vs TurboTronic AF11M

What T17205 does better (6) and where AF11M wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Tower T17205
TowerT17205
5.5Score
6 advantages≈ US$50
Higher score
vs
TurboTronic AF11M
TurboTronic · 2022AF11M
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$50
3.1Power & capacity2.1
6.9Versatility6.1
8.4Controls & convenience3.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

T17205AF11M
250 × 278366310 × 263310
T17205AF11MDifference
Height278 mm263 mm+15 mm
Width250 mm310 mm−60 mm
Depth366 mm310 mm+56 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T17205 better than AF11M?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l vs 3.5 l+14%
  2. Power1,300 W vs 1,200 W+8%
  3. Grill functionYes · AF11M: No
  4. Keep warmYes · AF11M: No
  5. DisplayTouchscreen vs LED
  6. Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%

Why is AF11M better than T17205?

  1. BakingNo · T17205: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Tower T17205Tower T17205≈ US$505.5
TurboTronic AF11MTurboTronic AF11M≈ US$503.8
Power & capacity
Power1,300 W1,200 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)4 l3.5 l
Automatic programmes6—
Max. temperature200 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
Functions—Air fry, Bake
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoYes
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowNoNo
Rotating basket / rotisserieNo—
Controls & smart
DisplayTouchscreenLED
TimerYesYes
Max. timer60 min—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe parts—No
Non-stick coating—No
Housing—Plastic
Width250 mm310 mm
Height278 mm263 mm
Depth366 mm310 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare