2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. EY8328E0 vs Masterchef Grande Food QB813D38

Tefal EY8328E0 vs Tefal Masterchef Grande Food QB813D38

What EY8328E0 does better (3) and where Masterchef Grande Food QB813D38 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Tefal EY8328E0
Tefal · 2025EY8328E0
8.8Score
3 advantages≈ US$120
vs
Tefal Masterchef Grande Food QB813D38
8.9Score
0 advantages
Higher score
8.9Power & capacity8.8
7.0Versatility9.1
7.4Controls & convenience5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

EY8328E0Masterchef Grande Food QB813D38
279 × 421279333 × 450422
EY8328E0Masterchef Grande Food QB813D38Difference
Height421 mm450 mm−29 mm
Width279 mm333 mm−54 mm
Depth279 mm422 mm−143 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is EY8328E0 better than Masterchef Grande Food QB813D38?

  1. Power2,020 W vs 1,500 W+35%
  2. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l vs 6.7 l+4%
  3. TimerYes · Masterchef Grande Food QB813D38: No

Why is Masterchef Grande Food QB813D38 better than EY8328E0?

Masterchef Grande Food QB813D38 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Tefal EY8328E0Tefal EY8328E0≈ US$1208.8
Power & capacity
Power2,020 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)7 l6.7 l
Speed settings—8
Max. temperature240 °C—
Min. temperature80 °C—
Food capacity1.5 kg—
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing action—Yes
Pulse function—Yes
Soft start—No
Heating / cooking function—No
Bowl material—Stainless steel
Attachments included—Whisk, Dough hook, Mincer
Number of accessories—6
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, Bake, Grill, ReheatKnead, Whisk, Mix, Slice, Blend
SteamingNo—
BakingYes—
Grill functionYes—
DehydratingNo—
Keep warmNo—
Baskets / cooking zones1—
Viewing windowYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayNone (dials / switches)—
TimerYesNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYes—
HousingPlasticMetal
Weight—14.6 kg
Width279 mm333 mm
Height421 mm450 mm
Depth279 mm422 mm
ColoursBlackSilver
SeriesTefal Easy Fry—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare