2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer vs FP800

Swan SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer vs TurboTronic FP800

What SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer does better (1) and where FP800 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Swan SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer
5.8Score
1 advantage
Higher score
vs
TurboTronic FP800
TurboTronic · 2025FP800
5.7Score
2 advantages≈ US$55
3.7Power & capacity3.4
3.9Versatility4.1
8.6Controls & convenience8.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

SP42010 LebensmittelzerkleinererFP800
220 × 260180210 × 360194
SP42010 LebensmittelzerkleinererFP800Difference
Height260 mm360 mm−100 mm
Width220 mm210 mm+10 mm
Depth180 mm194 mm−14 mm
Weight1.9 kg1.6 kg+0.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer better than FP800?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)1.8 l vs 1.2 l+50%

Why is FP800 better than SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer?

  1. Power300 W vs 800 W2.7×
  2. Pulse functionNo · SP42010 Lebensmittelzerkleinerer: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

TurboTronic FP800TurboTronic FP800≈ US$555.7
Power & capacity
Power300 W800 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)1.8 l1.2 l
Speed settings22
Top speed26,000 rpm—
Mixing & processing
Attachment hub (power outlet)—No
Pulse functionNoYes
Soft startNoNo
Bowl materialGlass—
Attachments included—Citrus press
Number of accessories—1
Cooking modes
FunctionsChop, Crush ice, BlendKnead, Mix, Chop, Slice, Blend
Controls & smart
TimerNoNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsYesYes
Weight1.9 kg1.6 kg
Width220 mm210 mm
Height260 mm360 mm
Depth180 mm194 mm
ColoursSilver, BlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare