2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. SKMW 900 vs 3in1

Silvercrest SKMW 900 vs Zilan 3in1

What SKMW 900 does better (2) and where 3in1 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Silvercrest SKMW 900
Silvercrest · 2022SKMW 900
4.1Score
2 advantages≈ US$160
vs
Zilan 3in1
Zilan · 20233in1
7.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$160
Higher score
3.0Power & capacity5.4
5.8Versatility9.1
5.0Controls & convenience6.4

Why is SKMW 900 better than 3in1?

  1. Speed settings8 vs 6+33%
  2. Number of accessories7 vs 6+17%

Why is 3in1 better than SKMW 900?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.6 l vs 5.5 l+53%
  2. Planetary mixing actionNo · SKMW 900: Yes
  3. Power900 W vs 1,000 W+11%
  4. Pulse functionNo · SKMW 900: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Zilan 3in1Zilan 3in1≈ US$1607.4
Power & capacity
Power900 W1,000 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.6 l5.5 l
Speed settings86
Mixing & processing
Planetary mixing actionNoYes
Pulse functionNoYes
Soft startNoNo
Built-in scaleYes—
Heating / cooking functionNoNo
Blender jug1 l—
Bowl materialStainless steelStainless steel
Attachments includedWhisk, Dough hook, Splash guard, ScaleWhisk, Dough hook, Splash guard, Mincer
Number of accessories76
Cooking modes
FunctionsKnead, Mix, Blend, WeighKnead, Mix
Controls & smart
TimerNoNo
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Housing—Stainless steel
Cord length—1.1 m
Weight—4.2 kg
ColoursRedBlack, Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare