- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- SKMW 900 vs 3in1
Silvercrest SKMW 900 vs Zilan 3in1
What SKMW 900 does better (2) and where 3in1 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is SKMW 900 better than 3in1?
- Speed settings8 vs 6+33%
- Number of accessories7 vs 6+17%
Why is 3in1 better than SKMW 900?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)3.6 l vs 5.5 l+53%
- Planetary mixing actionNo · SKMW 900: Yes
- Power900 W vs 1,000 W+11%
- Pulse functionNo · SKMW 900: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 900 W | 1,000 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 3.6 l | 5.5 l |
| Speed settings | 8 | 6 |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | No | Yes |
| Pulse function | No | Yes |
| Soft start | No | No |
| Built-in scale | Yes | — |
| Heating / cooking function | No | No |
| Blender jug | 1 l | — |
| Bowl material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Attachments included | Whisk, Dough hook, Splash guard, Scale | Whisk, Dough hook, Splash guard, Mincer |
| Number of accessories | 7 | 6 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Mix, Blend, Weigh | Knead, Mix |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Timer | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | No |
| Housing | — | Stainless steel |
| Cord length | — | 1.1 m |
| Weight | — | 4.2 kg |
| Colours | Red | Black, Silver |
