- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Retro 1973 SKML 600 vs Planetenrührer TRI-YG-03020
Silvercrest Retro 1973 SKML 600 vs Yato Planetenrührer TRI-YG-03020
What Retro 1973 SKML 600 does better (3) and where Planetenrührer TRI-YG-03020 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Power & capacity2.4
7.6Versatility4.2
8.0Controls & convenience2.3
Why is Retro 1973 SKML 600 better than Planetenrührer TRI-YG-03020?
- Number of accessories6 vs 16×
- Dishwasher-safe partsYes · Planetenrührer TRI-YG-03020: No
- Power600 W vs 500 W+20%
Why is Planetenrührer TRI-YG-03020 better than Retro 1973 SKML 600?
Planetenrührer TRI-YG-03020 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 600 W | 500 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5 l | — |
| Speed settings | 8 | — |
| Max. dough per batch | 1.6 kg | — |
| Mixing & processing | ||
| Planetary mixing action | Yes | Yes |
| Mixer design | Lift arm (multi-position) | — |
| Attachment hub (power outlet) | No | No |
| Pulse function | No | — |
| Soft start | No | — |
| Heating / cooking function | No | No |
| Bowl material | — | Stainless steel |
| Attachments included | Whisk, Dough hook, Splash guard | — |
| Number of accessories | 6 | 1 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Knead, Whisk, Mix | Knead, Mix |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | None (dials / switches) | None (dials / switches) |
| Timer | No | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | Yes | No |
| Housing | — | Stainless steel |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | — |
| Width | 221 mm | — |
| Height | 323 mm | — |
| Depth | 346 mm | — |
| Colours | — | Silver |
Related comparisons
vs
Silvercrest Retro 1973 SKML 600vsHomCom 800-297V90BK
6.67.1
vs
Silvercrest Retro 1973 SKML 600vsKraft&Dele KD4146
6.66.8
vs
Silvercrest Retro 1973 SKML 600vsAlpina MEMIPO16510/0035
6.66.2
vs
Silvercrest Retro 1973 SKML 600vsSalter Kuro EK5620MBLK
6.66.2
vs
Yato Planetenrührer TRI-YG-03020vsADE Twister 7
3.83.7
vs
Yato Planetenrührer TRI-YG-03020vsResto Italia Pina Line MO 10 VV