- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- Cook@Home vs Good To Go
Russell Hobbs Cook@Home vs Russell Hobbs Good To Go
What Cook@Home does better (3) and where Good To Go wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.3Power & capacity5.1
3.4Versatility7.0
8.9Controls & convenience4.3
Why is Cook@Home better than Good To Go?
- Dishwasher-safe partsYes · Good To Go: No
- Power900 W vs 750 W+20%
- Non-stick coatingYes · Good To Go: No
Why is Good To Go better than Cook@Home?
- Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l vs 6.5 l+30%
- Slow cookingNo · Cook@Home: Yes
- Sauté / searNo · Cook@Home: Yes
- Sous-videNo · Cook@Home: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 900 W | 750 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5 l | 6.5 l |
| Automatic programmes | 11 | — |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Steam, Keep warm | Cook, Steam, Sauté, Slow cook, Sous-vide, Roast, Keep warm, Rice |
| Pressure cooking | No | No |
| Slow cooking | No | Yes |
| Steaming | Yes | Yes |
| Sauté / sear | No | Yes |
| Sous-vide | No | Yes |
| Yoghurt programme | No | No |
| Air frying | No | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | Yes | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LED | — |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Delay start | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | Yes | No |
| Non-stick coating | Yes | No |
| Housing | Stainless steel | — |
| Width | — | 215 mm |
| Height | — | 320 mm |
| Depth | — | 490 mm |
| Colours | Silver, Black | Black |
