2,517 models · 438 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. FRH 1700 vs Thunder

Rommelsbacher FRH 1700 vs Ufesa Thunder

What FRH 1700 does better (4) and where Thunder wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Rommelsbacher FRH 1700
Rommelsbacher · 2024FRH 1700
8.9Score
4 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
vs
Ufesa Thunder
Ufesa · 2024Thunder
7.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$75
7.3Power & capacity7.3
8.9Versatility4.1
8.4Controls & convenience8.7

Why is FRH 1700 better than Thunder?

  1. BakingYes · Thunder: No
  2. Grill functionYes · Thunder: No
  3. Keep warmYes · Thunder: No
  4. Max. temperature200 °C vs 180 °C+11%

Why is Thunder better than FRH 1700?

  1. Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l vs 9 l+12%
  2. DisplayLED vs Touchscreen
Specifications

Side by side

Ufesa ThunderUfesa Thunder≈ US$757.8
Power & capacity
Power1,700 W1,700 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)8 l9 l
Automatic programmes—11
Max. temperature200 °C180 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsAir fry, Bake, Roast, Grill, Keep warmAir fry
SteamingNoNo
BakingYesNo
Grill functionYesNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmYesNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYes—
Interior lightYes—
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDTouchscreen
TimerYesYes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingYesYes
HousingStainless steelPlastic
Width260 mm—
Height300 mm—
Depth470 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare