3,254 models · 479 brandsupdated 14 Nov 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. R301001 VENTO vs 27620-56 Satisfry

Remoska R301001 VENTO vs Russell Hobbs 27620-56 Satisfry

What R301001 VENTO does better (2) and where 27620-56 Satisfry wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Remoska R301001 VENTO
Remoska · 2025R301001 VENTO
4.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$90
vs
Russell Hobbs 27620-56 Satisfry
Russell Hobbs · 202527620-56 Satisfry
4.7Score
1 advantage≈ US$80
Higher score
3.4Power & capacity5.0
4.1Versatility4.1
6.8Controls & convenience2.7

Why is R301001 VENTO better than 27620-56 Satisfry?

  1. Viewing windowYes · 27620-56 Satisfry: No
  2. DisplayLCD vs None (dials / switches)

Why is 27620-56 Satisfry better than R301001 VENTO?

  1. Power1,350 W vs 1,500 W+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power1,350 W1,500 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5.5 l5.5 l
Automatic programmes—9
Max. temperature190 °C190 °C
Cooking modes
FunctionsCook, Air fry, ReheatCook, Air fry, Reheat
SteamingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoNo
Baskets / cooking zones11
Viewing windowYesNo
Controls & smart
DisplayLCDNone (dials / switches)
Timer—Yes
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoNo
Non-stick coatingNoNo
HousingPlasticPlastic
Width—280 mm
Height—305 mm
Depth—361 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare