2,326 models · 427 brandsupdated 23 Oct 2026
  1. Baker & Spice
  2. Compare
  3. SkyCooker M800 vs Cook@Home

Redmond SkyCooker M800 vs Russell Hobbs Cook@Home

What SkyCooker M800 does better (1) and where Cook@Home wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Redmond SkyCooker M800
Redmond · 2016SkyCooker M800
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ US$170
vs
Russell Hobbs Cook@Home
Russell Hobbs · 2015Cook@Home
5.4Score
5 advantages≈ US$85
Higher score
5.0Power & capacity3.3
2.1Versatility3.4
2.4Controls & convenience8.9

Why is SkyCooker M800 better than Cook@Home?

  1. Automatic programmes48 vs 114.4×

Why is Cook@Home better than SkyCooker M800?

  1. Dishwasher-safe partsNo · SkyCooker M800: Yes
  2. SteamingNo · SkyCooker M800: Yes
  3. Keep warmNo · SkyCooker M800: Yes
  4. TimerNo · SkyCooker M800: Yes
  5. Non-stick coatingNo · SkyCooker M800: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Power & capacity
Power900 W900 W
Capacity (bowl / basket / pot)5 l5 l
Automatic programmes4811
Cooking modes
FunctionsReheatSteam, Keep warm
Pressure cookingNoNo
Slow cookingNoNo
SteamingNoYes
Sauté / searNoNo
Sous-videNoNo
Yoghurt programmeNoNo
Air fryingNoNo
BakingNoNo
Grill functionNoNo
DehydratingNoNo
Keep warmNoYes
Controls & smart
DisplayLEDLED
TimerNoYes
Delay startNoNo
App controlYes—
Design & build
Dishwasher-safe partsNoYes
Non-stick coatingNoYes
Housing—Stainless steel
ColoursBlackSilver, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare