- Baker & Spice
- Compare
- RMC-M90 vs Cook@Home
Redmond RMC-M90 vs Russell Hobbs Cook@Home
What RMC-M90 does better (4) and where Cook@Home wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is RMC-M90 better than Cook@Home?
- Automatic programmes45 vs 114.1×
- Air fryingYes · Cook@Home: No
- DisplayLCD vs LED
- Delay startYes · Cook@Home: No
Why is Cook@Home better than RMC-M90?
- Dishwasher-safe partsNo · RMC-M90: Yes
- Power860 W vs 900 W+5%
- Non-stick coatingNo · RMC-M90: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Power & capacity | ||
| Power | 860 W | 900 W |
| Capacity (bowl / basket / pot) | 5 l | 5 l |
| Automatic programmes | 45 | 11 |
| Cooking modes | ||
| Functions | Steam, Air fry, Reheat, Keep warm | Steam, Keep warm |
| Pressure cooking | No | No |
| Slow cooking | No | No |
| Steaming | Yes | Yes |
| Sauté / sear | No | No |
| Sous-vide | No | No |
| Yoghurt programme | No | No |
| Air frying | Yes | No |
| Baking | No | No |
| Grill function | No | No |
| Dehydrating | No | No |
| Keep warm | Yes | Yes |
| Controls & smart | ||
| Display | LCD | LED |
| Timer | Yes | Yes |
| Delay start | Yes | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Dishwasher-safe parts | No | Yes |
| Non-stick coating | No | Yes |
| Housing | Metal | Stainless steel |
| Colours | Silver | Silver, Black |
